You are the embodiment of why I cannot call myself a feminist. I don't believe that a paid job is
ever more important than the unpaid honor of being a mother. Your children need their mother. Period. The fact you returned to work
three days after giving birth to a child with special needs reflects how little your bonding with this new life means to you. You chose to have babies. As an adult, you are well aware that sexual intercourse without birth control means you run a very high risk of getting pregnant (Penis+Vagina=Baby; P+V=B, for short). The
honor you feel in the receiving of this special soul is moot in the face of the disregard you've shown by putting your paid job over the needs of your child; all babies
need and
deserve their mother available to them. Will you openly and willingly disregard the needs of your family for the needs of this country? Your answer of *yes* only fuels my passion for your loss at the polls.
Further evidence of your disregard for your children is evident in your daughter's announcement of her pregnancy
before marriage. Lord knows I have no issue with children conceived and/or born outside of wedlock -- I was a one-night-stand baby who's parents have been married for 40.5 years. I have
HUGE issue with folks who stand on their bible and state "
Abstinence Only" is the only method of sexual education our kids need. Looks like your hypocrisy has bitten you in the proverbial ASS, honey! If only your daughter could have come to you for support in choosing an effective form of birth control. If only you would have talked to your daughter about the options of physical love available to her. If only she'd known that outercourse and oral sex were of no to low risk for pregnancy & disease. If only you were open to knowing and supporting her first great love affair.
And while were on the topic of pregnancy... I really don't mind of a man thinks women are too stupid to be granted the same privacy in the doctor's office that the constitution guarantees all citizens; they're far from being a woman, it's okay. For a
woman to support this idea, is completely beyond my human understanding. And yeah, that's exactly what I think the so-called "Pro-Life" movement really is: the overwhelming belief that the constitution doesn't apply to women, the
weaker gender. So, we're smart enough to run for vice-president, leaving our children to the care of strangers, but we're not smart enough to have a
private conversation/procedure at our doctors' offices? hmmmm... please explain how this makes sense in your mind. (for what it's worth, I am
full-on Pro-Life, I think life is amazing and everyone who has a chance to live should take it; doesn't mean however, that I am anti-choice or somehow selective in my application of the constitution. I guess that makes me 100%
Pro-Constitution)
I can't even touch on the politics you stand for... Have you seen the
tenants of the Republican Party? They're
here, on the official Republican Party page. If you read them carefully, you will understand, as I do, that I am more of a Republican than the people you're meeting with on a regular basis. Perhaps you should take these to heart, they're more important to the Vice President's job than the 10 Commandments. Truly. (e.g. while the commandments have nothing to say about shooting your best friend in the face, the republicans would say that act violates the first tenant: ...each person’s dignity, freedom, ability and responsibility must be honored)
I look even more forward to your ticket's defeat this coming November than I had before you joined the team. I think it's only fair for me to state clearly exactly why I'll be working tirelessly to ensure your family does not become the model of what is healthy, happy and right in America today.
Namaste,
me ♥